I walked away with a solid grasp of key building blocks like the Enterprise Continuum and the Architecture Content Framework.

Important topics like architecture governance, capability, and content structure are explained in a straightforward manner.

Good for understanding core concepts, though not very engaging. Helpful, but not exactly exciting or innovative.

This course offers a comprehensive journey through key modules in enterprise architecture. Found it more useful.

Comprehensive introduction to TOGAF 10; well-structured content ideal for beginners in enterprise architecture.

The detailing is fine, but there is nothing practical. Some practical modules or sections should be included.

The Architecture Development Method (ADM) phases are broken down step by step with practical explanations.

Good overview of TOGAF for novices. Speed is a bit slow but you can skip through it and not use the voice

The course gives a decent overview of the TOGAF 10 framework and helps understand the major concepts.

Not always exciting, but useful for anyone working in architecture or digital transformation roles.

Excellent material! Speaker English could use some improvement to avoid sudden breaks in sentences

The pacing of the course allows learners to absorb complex topics without feeling overwhelmed.

Decent introduction to TOGAF 10; covers basics well but lacks practical, real-world examples.

Perfect for people entering enterprise architecture for the first time.

Framework guiding enterprise architecture with structured methodology.

falta material como plantillas , guias

Honestly, the cyclical nature of ADM and multiple components associated with Architecture are too much to absorb in short courses. Also many of these principles mentioned in TOGAF are alread followed in multinational organizations even if they are not labelled as in TOGAF. While going through the course I could correlate many of such activities with the work I do and did in past 18 years. But when it comes to quizzes and explanation I find the course material is not powerful or practical enough from learning perspective. Too few examples given to match to real workflow in big organization which follows such standards, the videos and reading material didn't cover what is asked in the quizzes, I am a hands-on person and I learn when I can relate the learning to my own experiences. Specially, the multi-choice quizzes have multiple possible options closely matching, but a difficult quiz and weak learning are not attributes of a Good Learning Experience. If you read though here I thank you to be part of my little Tedx-Talk here, and I feel a little less frustrated after finishing this course and writing this review! OK for getting introduced to TOGAF but it didn't made me fall in love with it, yet!

I'll be honest here, and say I didn't think the content in the videos was that engaging, and I found some of the questions to be ambiguous and seemingly misaligned with the TOGAF 10 literature (I'm not an expert, so I could be wrong.) What would greatly improve the course is if the learnings referenced the literature in the TOGAF guide. (i.e. for this module, reference Phases A and B of the ADM model, and [link-to-the-content].

good content, but more quality controll (check slides for proper English, take a second take on audio when stumbling in the script...) would have profited. Especially, because the questions sometimes are NOT answered in the modules, but turn into a guessing game.

maybe the tutor can explain with example in real company or real process in order to we better understand about this TOGAF.

Good entry point for understanding enterprise architecture basics

nice overview

While TOGAF 10 is already a complex topic, the presentation makes the topic more complex. A lot of anecdotes are inserted without proper linkage to the topic. I am doing this as a refresher having taken a two day proper course of TOGAF 10. Wish the answers to the questions at the assessment can be clearly traced and reference to the modules being presented

The lecture delivery is not professional. It is more like reading from the notes. The slides are very basic and do not cover the important points. Presentation is below average. A major improvement is required to make it more engaging and informative.

Instructor was hard to understand and did not speak English on a proficient level. There was no consistent use of certains terms and descriptions between lessons and quizzes, making sometimes hard to understand the questions in the quizzes